Our goal in choosing workshops is to provide a selection of workshops that will be attractive to attendees, well-organized, and effectively presented. Of course, it is also important that the presenters have appropriate expertise in the area of the workshop. With this in mind, answers to the following questions are most useful in workshop reviews:
Please include constructive criticism, even for a workshop proposal that you do not think should be included in the conference. We hope the proposers will take your comments to heart and write better proposals for future workshops. Successful proposers have a chance to revise their abstract, and also, of course to plan their workshop with your suggestions in mind.
As with papers, the best reviews clearly justify the reviewer's choice of rating.
Below are examples of comments that have been found in good, useful workshop reviews:
Please contact the SIGCSE 2014 Workshops Co-Chairs with your questions:
Metropolitan State University